Demo report · Illustrative data, not a real candidate record.
Backend debugging screen

Demo Candidate

Solved an off-by-one pagination defect with a narrow patch, clean verification, and a clear work trail that a reviewer can inspect.

Evidence confidence

Moderate

Complete trail · early history

Evidence confidence

Moderate

Complete work trail; early exercise history

Time spent

38m 12s

No speed ranking applied

Private checks

4 / 4

Final change cleared every check

Patch size

1 file

No unrelated files changed

work-evidence.json

Check runs

9

Submits

3

Files opened

7

Diff size

+6 / -2

This summary comes from recorded actions and private checks. Review the work trail before making an interview decision.

Candidate-provided AI context

Used Copilot after forming a working theory.

Rejected a broad API rewrite, kept the one-file fix, then reran the checks. This description came from the candidate; the check runs and patch size were observed by Buglyst.

debug-timeline.log
Work trail

Debugging timeline

00:04

Triaged failure

Reproduced the pagination bug and isolated the failing test path before editing.

12:18

Narrowed boundary

Compared page sizes and identified the off-by-one condition at the cursor boundary.

25:44

Patched carefully

Changed the boundary check with a narrow diff and preserved tenant filtering behavior.

34:52

Verified twice

Ran targeted checks before submit, then reran the hidden validation leg.

recorded-evidence.txt
Recorded evidence

What the candidate's work showed

Investigation

Observed

Narrowed from the failing test to the relevant code without broad rewrites.

Working theory

Recorded

Identified the pagination boundary and explained the expected behaviour.

Patch size

Observed

Changed one file and left unrelated behaviour untouched.

Final verification

Observed

Re-ran checks before submitting and cleared the private checks.

Evidence checks

Reasons to trust — or question — the trail

These checks point reviewers toward anything worth a closer look. They are never accusations by themselves.

Private exercise

Yes

Times this version was used

Low

Work pattern

Nothing unusual found

Similar submitted fixes

None found

Private checks

All cleared

Time spent

Shown as context

Team follow-up

Questions for the interview

  • Candidate debugged from evidence instead of trying random edits.
  • Communication was concise: stated hypothesis, test, result, and final tradeoff.
  • No matching submitted fix was found. This is supporting evidence, not an accusation or hiring decision.

How to use this report

Buglyst provides debugging-skill signals, not automatic hiring decisions.

Run this screen on a real role